Essentially, this is undoubtedly what had to happen. But Rome as a state retained too much of pagan civilization and wisdom-for example, the very aims and basic principles of the state. Whereas Christ's Church, having entered the state, no doubt could give up none of its own basic principles, of that rock on which it stood, and could pursue none but its own aims, once firmly established and shown to it by the Lord himself, among which was the transforming of the whole world, and therefore of the whole ancient pagan state, into the Church. Thus {that is, for future purposes}, it is not the Church that should seek a definite place for itself in the state, like 'any social organization' or 'organization of men for religious purposes' {as the author I was objecting to refers to the Church}, but, on the contrary, every earthly state must eventually be wholly transformed into the Church and become nothing else but the Church, rejecting whichever of its aims are incompatible with those of the Church. And all of this will in no way demean it, will take away neither its honor nor its glory as a great state, nor the glory of its rulers, but will only turn it from a false, still pagan and erroneous path, onto the right and true path that alone leads to eternal goals.
( Fyodor Dostoyevsky )
[ The Brothers Karamazov ]
www.QuoteSweet.com