The statement highlights a profound perspective on how society perceives individuals who diverge from accepted beliefs and narratives—what the text calls 'mythos.' When someone abandons the collective stories, traditions, or explanations that people rely on to find meaning or order, they are often labeled as "insane." This raises an important reflection on human psychology and social norms. Our understanding of sanity is deeply intertwined with conformity and shared stories that provide coherence to our worldview. Rejecting these stories, especially from a critical or independent perspective, can threaten what is considered 'normal,' leading to marginalization or accusations of insanity.

However, this critique invites us to question the rigid boundaries of normalcy and to consider the value of independent thought. When a person questions or rejects the existing mythos, they challenge the status quo and push the boundaries of understanding, potentially paving the way for new ways of thinking. Labeling such individuals as "insane" might serve as a social mechanism to dismiss disruptive ideas that threaten collective comfort or stability. Yet, history has shown that groundbreaking ideas often came from those perceived as mad at first—they question, dig deeper, and refuse to accept superficial explanations. From this perspective, being 'insane' may just be the initial stage of intellectual or spiritual breakthrough.

This quote urges a reflection on the importance of recognizing the wisdom that can come from outside accepted narratives. It highlights the paradox between societal labels and the pursuit of truth, suggesting that often what is deemed insane may be ahead of its time or simply unappreciated by a society unwilling to see beyond its mythos. Embracing diversity of thought and questioning accepted beliefs are crucial for progress and understanding, rather than dismissing those who challenge conventions as simply "insane."