In the dialogue, there is a stark contrast drawn between books and divine truth. One character argues that books can mislead and distort reality, while asserting that God is incapable of lying. This reflects a deep philosophical inquiry into the nature of truth and the reliability of human narratives compared to divine words. The emphasis on God's words suggests a belief in an ultimate, unchanging truth that transcends human interpretation. The judge's response reinforces the notion that divine truth is infallible. This interaction underscores a theme common in literature: the struggle between subjective human experiences and the objective truths believed to be handed down by a higher power. It invites the audience to reflect on where they place their trust in the quest for understanding reality.

In the dialogue, there is a stark contrast drawn between books and divine truth. One character argues that books can mislead and distort reality, while asserting that God is incapable of lying. This reflects a deep philosophical inquiry into the nature of truth and the reliability of human narratives compared to divine words. The emphasis on God's words suggests a belief in an ultimate, unchanging truth that transcends human interpretation.

The judge's response reinforces the notion that divine truth is infallible. This interaction underscores a theme common in literature: the struggle between subjective human experiences and the objective truths believed to be handed down by a higher power. It invites the audience to reflect on where they place their trust in the quest for understanding reality.