I could now {possibly} go back and restretch those shrunken hours, flake the images separate, arrange them in accurate chronological order, {possibly; with will-power, patience, and the proper chemicals} but being accurate is not necessarily being honest.... Nor is chronological reporting by any means always the most truthful {each camera has its own veracity} especially when, in all good faith, one cannot truthfully claim to remember what happened accurately....
In Ken Kesey's "Sometimes a Great Notion," the speaker reflects on the challenges of accurately reconstructing memories and past events. They consider the effort required to revisit and rearrange their recollections, suggesting that it's possible to impose a structure on shrunken moments with enough determination, patience, and the right methods. However, this clarity does not guarantee honesty, highlighting the complexity of memory.
The speaker also acknowledges that chronological order may not capture the truth of experiences as each perspective carries its own validity. They question the reliability of memory, suggesting that even the best intentions may fall short in conveying the true essence of what has occurred, illuminating the subjective nature of personal history.