In any case, Cide Hamete Benengeli was a very careful historian, and very accurate in all things, as can be clearly seen in the details he relates to us, for although they are trivial and inconsequential, he does not attempt to pass over them in silence; his example could be followed by solemn historians who recount actions so briefly and succinctly that we can barely taste them, and leave behind in the inkwell, through carelessness, malice, or ignorance, the most substantive part of the work.
Cide Hamete Benengeli is depicted as a meticulous historian whose attention to detail sets him apart. Despite the trivial nature of some events he discusses, his commitment to documenting every aspect reflects a thoroughness that is commendable. This contrasts sharply with certain historians who choose to overlook significant elements, resulting in a lack of depth and engagement in their narratives.
The author's critique suggests that many historians could benefit from Benengeli's example, emphasizing the importance of including all relevant details, regardless of how insignificant they may seem. By doing so, they enrich their accounts and provide readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, rather than leaving them with a mere outline devoid of substance.
