It could all be unreal - how could you ever tell otherwise? You took it on trust, in part because what would be the point of doing anything else? When the fake behaved exactly like the real, why treat it as anything different? You gave it the benefit of the doubt, until something proved otherwise.
The quote reflects on the nature of reality and perception, questioning how one can distinguish between what is genuine and what is artificial. It suggests that trust plays a significant role in our understanding, as individuals often choose to accept their experiences as real for the sake of convenience and mental comfort. When the counterfeit mimics the authentic closely, there seems to be little reason to treat them differently.
This perspective emphasizes a philosophical dilemma regarding existence and trust. It implies that giving a situation the benefit of the doubt is a common response, as people typically await proof before challenging their perceptions. In this view, reality may hinge on subjective experience, making it difficult to discern truth amidst a facade.
