It's a shame for women's history to be all about men--first boys, then other boys, then men men men. It reminds me of the way our school history textbooks were all about wars and elections, one war after another, with the dull periods of peace skimmed over whenever they occurred. {Our teachers deplored this and added extra units about social history and protest movements, but that was still the message of the books.}
In "The Swan Thieves," Elizabeth Kostova critiques the way women's history is often overshadowed by men's achievements and narratives. She highlights a pattern where history overwhelmingly focuses on male figures and their actions, neglecting the equally significant contributions of women. This perspective mirrors the educational experience many have, where school history predominantly covers wars and political events, sidelining social contexts and peaceful periods.
Kostova reflects on her own experiences with history education, noting that despite some attempts by teachers to incorporate social history and movements into the curriculum, the dominant theme remained centered around men and their accomplishments. This imbalance not only diminishes the representation of women's history but also reinforces a narrow understanding of the past, where women's roles and stories are often minimized or forgotten.