This quote underscores a profound moral principle that legal validity should not be solely based on procedural or authoritative criteria but also on the fundamental notion of justice. When a law is inherently unjust, it violates the ethical principles that underpin a fair and equitable society. Such laws, in the eyes of many philosophers and ethicists, lack legitimacy and moral authority. This perspective invites us to reflect on the importance of morality in lawmaking and enforcement. If laws are rooted exclusively in authority or tradition but neglect the principles of justice, they risk becoming tools of oppression rather than instruments of social good. Historically, numerous social movements and acts of civil disobedience have been justified on this basis—that unjust laws must be challenged and ultimately changed, as they can corrupt the moral fabric of society. This idea encourages individuals to critically assess laws beyond their mere existence or societal consensus, urging us to prioritize justice even when it means defying established regulations. The principle also raises questions about the role of conscience and individual moral judgment in civic life. Should citizens comply with unjust laws simply because they are laws, or do they have an obligation to oppose or disobey them to uphold higher principles? Ultimately, this quote champions the pursuit of justice as a foundational element of lawful and ethical society, advocating for moral integrity over blind obedience. It reminds us that legality does not automatically equate to morality and encourages activism and moral courage in confronting injustice.