Mrs Scorrier ought to sit at the bottom of the table,' said Aubrey positively. 'You mean the foot of the table: opposite to the head, you understand,' said Mrs Scorrier instructively. 'Yes, of course,' replied Aubrey, looking surprised. 'Did I say bottom? I wonder what made me do that?
Aubrey confidently mentioned that Mrs. Scorrier should sit at the bottom of the table, implying a sense of hierarchy in seating arrangements. Mrs. Scorrier, however, corrected him, clarifying that she should occupy the foot of the table, which is directly opposite the head. This exchange highlights the nuances in social positioning during a meal.
Aubrey's surprise at his own choice of words suggests he was not fully aware of the implications of his phrasing. It demonstrates his innocence in social etiquette, as he momentarily conflated 'bottom' with 'foot' in a formal context. This playful dialogue illustrates the subtle complexities of social interactions in a dinner setting.
