This quote offers a subtle critique of the nature of reading and the purposes we assign to books. It suggests that as long as books are light entertainment—merely stories without the burden of reflection or practical knowledge—they can be freely enjoyed. The speaker evidently finds value in stories that do not challenge or deepen understanding, perhaps because these serve as a form of escapism or relaxation. From a broader perspective, it raises questions about the function of literature: should it solely serve as a mirror to real life and a source of enlightenment, or is it also important as a refuge from it? The mention of knowing 'nothing like useful knowledge' implies a recognition that certain types of reading lack tangible benefits but can still be emotionally or aesthetically enriching. This subtly hints at the idea that reading is multifaceted; not all reading needs to be educational or morally instructive to be valuable. The speaker’s acceptance and even approval of such books reveal a pragmatic attitude—if they do not threaten or diminish one's understanding, they are harmless and perhaps even harmless pleasures. This lends a nuanced perspective on literary consumption, suggesting that not all readers seek profundity or reflection in their books; some merely desire entertainment or a harmless escape. In a modern context, this highlights the importance of valuing diverse literary experiences—there's room for books that serve different purposes, whether enlightening, reflective, or simply entertaining. Ultimately, it underscores that the worth of a book isn't solely dictated by its capacity to impart useful knowledge but also by its ability to provide happiness or relief without undermining one's sense of reflection or awareness.