The best she was able to do was to reflect that people invariably exhibited the very worst side of their flawed natures when invited to put their thoughts into writing, especially when the invitation was sanctioned hit-and-run posing as democracy in action. Here
The author reflects on the tendency of people to display their worst qualities when asked to express their thoughts in writing. This observation stems from a situation where individuals feel empowered to share their opinions, often leading to negative and flawed expressions. In a context that resembles a quick and superficial form of democracy, these writings can reveal more about the writers' shortcomings than about constructive discourse.
In a society where instant communication is common, the invitation to write can become a double-edged sword. Instead of fostering meaningful dialogue, it may prompt people to react impulsively, showcasing their insecurities and flaws. The author suggests that this phenomenon highlights a broader critique of how democratic processes can sometimes devolve into mere appearances, lacking genuine engagement and understanding.
