Harold Pinter characterizes the invasion of Iraq as a fundamentally unlawful act, likening it to the actions of a bandit. He argues that the military intervention lacked both legitimacy and justification, suggesting that it was driven by self-interest rather than the protection of human rights or the establishment of peace. He critiques the invasion as an example of aggression that disregards international law and the sovereignty of nations.

Pinter's statement reflects his belief that such invasions are not just political maneuvers but moral failures that lead to devastating consequences for the affected countries and their populations. By framing it as a "bandit act," he emphasizes the violence and coercion involved, urging a reconsideration of how powerful nations justify their military actions. This perspective invites a critical examination of the broader implications of war and interventionism in contemporary geopolitics.