The judge watched him. He began to point out various men in the room and to ask if these men were here for a good time or if indeed they knew why they were here at all.Everybody dont have to have a reason to be someplace.That's so, said the judge. They do not have to have a reason. But order is not set aside because of their indifference.
The judge observed a man in the courtroom who began identifying other individuals present and questioned their purpose for attending. He suggested that not everyone needs a specific reason to be in a place, indicating a sense of casualness about their presence. This brings forth the idea that people often find themselves in situations without understanding their true significance.
In response, the judge affirmed that while individuals may lack personal motives, the overarching order and structure of life remain intact regardless of their indifference. This highlights a deeper philosophical perspective on the nature of existence, where the chaos of human intention doesn't disrupt the inherent rules that govern society.
