There is a great difference between those phenomena which are accepted on faith, and those which are proved by objective determination, though the cause of both may be equally 'rational' once known. And the chief difference is this: that people will treat with disdain such phenomena as are proved by the evidence of the senses, and commonly experienced-while they will defend to the death the reality of a phenomenon which they have neither seen nor experienced.
The quote highlights the significant distinction between beliefs held on faith and those established through objective evidence. It emphasizes that while both may ultimately be rational when understood, society often tends to dismiss tangible experiences in favor of abstract beliefs. This suggests a paradox in human perception where observable truths are overlooked in favor of faith-based convictions.
This phenomenon reflects how people can vehemently defend ideas or beliefs that they have never encountered firsthand, prioritizing them over practical experiences. It showcases a tendency to embrace the unknown with passion, even in the face of demonstrable reality, revealing the complexities of human understanding and belief systems.
