they were unable to hire a law firm with a top-notch white-collar government practice. By the time Bannon and Priebus were back in Washington, three blue-chip firms had said no. All of them were afraid they would face a rebellion among the younger staff if they represented Trump, afraid Trump would publicly humiliate them if the going got tough, and afraid Trump would stiff them for the bill. In the end, nine top firms turned them down.

(0 Reviews)

In "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," author Michael Wolff details the challenges faced by Trump’s aides, particularly Bannon and Priebus, in securing high-quality legal representation. They encountered significant resistance from premier law firms, which declined to take on the case predominantly due to concerns over potential backlash from their younger attorneys. These firms feared that representing Trump could lead to reputational risks and possible public disgrace if conflicts arose.

Ultimately, the rejection came from nine prominent legal firms. Their hesitance was fueled by the belief that Trump might not only denounce them publicly during difficult times, but also risk refusing to pay their fees, thus leaving them vulnerable. This situation underlines the complicated dynamics and apprehensions surrounding Trump's controversial presence and the subsequent decisions made by his closest advisors.

Page views
2
Update
February 05, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.