This quote touches on a common tension between artistic integrity and commercial success. Many artists, musicians included, often find themselves caught in a dilemma where their passion for their craft conflicts with the desire or necessity to make a living. This statement highlights a perspective where monetary gain is perceived as an unrelated or even a negative critique from others who may only see the artistic side. The speaker is challenging the judgment of being labeled solely as a musician, implying that their true goal is not necessarily artistic expression but financial stability or wealth.

The remark can be interpreted as a commentary on societal and industry expectations. Society often romanticizes musicians as artists driven purely by passion and creativity, yet the reality is that most need to support themselves financially, which can lead to labels like 'money-driven' overshadowing their artistic identity. It can also reflect the notion that the essence of music for certain individuals lies in its commercial potential rather than its artistic value.

Furthermore, it raises important questions about how we value art and the artists behind it. Is making money a betrayal of artistic integrity, or merely a pragmatic necessity? The quote suggests a dismissal of the stigma associated with financial motives in art, emphasizing that pursuit of money does not negate the artistry or talent involved in making music. It invites us to consider a more nuanced understanding of the motivations that drive creators and how society perceives their priorities.

Ultimately, this quote encourages a reflection on authenticity and the many layers of personal and professional motivations that underpin creative work. Recognizing that artists are multifaceted individuals who can be passionate about their craft while also seeking financial success helps foster a broader appreciation of their complex identities and the realities they face in balancing passion with livelihood.