Why is your equation only for angels, Roger? Why can't we do something, down here? Couldn't there be an equation for us too, something to help us find a safer place?' 'Why am I surrounded,' his usual understanding self today, 'by statistical illiterates? There's no way, love, not as long as the mean density of strikes is constant.
In this exchange, there is a frustration expressed over the lack of practical solutions for earthly concerns. The character questions why a mathematical equation, seemingly only applicable to angels, cannot be adapted to help those living in the tangible world. This highlights a desire for a framework that could guide humanity toward a safer existence, challenging the limitations of theoretical concepts when faced with real-life dangers.
However, the other character dismisses this notion, emphasizing a perception of ignorance in understanding statistics. He insists that the immutable nature of the average density of strikes makes it impossible to create such an equation for humans. This statement underscores a divide between theoretical understanding and the practical needs of people, suggesting that sometimes, the complexities of reality can't be simplified into helpful formulas.
