You're not working with models, you're working with real women who have, like, anatomy. Models do not have anatomy.
This quote underscores the fundamental difference between idealized representations and real human complexity. When people engage with models—especially in contexts like fashion, photography, or performance—they often envision a polished, often exaggerated version of reality. These models are designed to fit certain aesthetic standards, omitting the natural diversity and imperfections inherent in actual human anatomy. In contrast, real women embody a vast spectrum of physical traits, biological features, and imperfections that cannot be fully encapsulated or idealized in media or commercial images.
Recognizing this distinction is crucial, especially in conversations around body image, representation, and authenticity. It prompts us to appreciate the unique and authentic beauty of real women, which is often overlooked or misrepresented through idealized models. Emphasizing anatomy reminds us that human bodies are complex, functional, and diverse, and that beauty isn't confined to the narrow standards set by models crafted to sell products or portray ideal images.
This perspective encourages a shift towards more genuine representations that honor natural diversity, fostering self-acceptance and challenging unrealistic standards. In a broader sense, it advocates for respecting the complexity of human identity, emphasizing that individual physicality and individual identity go hand in hand—no one is a faceless model, but a full person with real anatomical features that make them unique.
