The quote touches upon the ongoing debate surrounding traditional media elements like 'Page 3', a feature historically associated with tabloid newspapers that often showcased topless models. The speaker admits to agreeing with Rupert Murdoch that such content may be viewed as outdated, implying that remove it could be justified by changing societal standards. However, they simultaneously suggest that 'Page 3' has become more than just a page; it has evolved into a cultural institution. This highlights the complex relationship society has with its media and the contradictions inherent in progress and tradition.

Reflecting on this, it is interesting to consider how certain media features, once considered provocative or controversial, can attain a form of cultural significance. They become embedded within the social fabric, sparking debates about morality, freedom of expression, and tradition. While modern viewpoints tend to push for more respectful or progressive content, these institutions often evoke nostalgia or symbolize a certain era's distinct identity.

This commentary underscores how societal values are fluid and how media influences perceptions of decency and cultural heritage. The idea that 'Page 3' is an institution suggests that it isn't merely about the images or the pages but about what they represent: a symbolic space for a particular form of expression. Dismantling such fixtures can lead to the perceived loss of cultural identity, sparking debates about whether progress necessitates the destruction of tradition or whether both can coexist. Ultimately, the quote emphasizes the importance of understanding what we preserve and what we choose to change in the cultural landscape.

In sum, it raises significant questions about the nature of societal change and the role media plays in shaping cultural institutions—whether we passively accept these changes or actively engage with what they signify about our collective identity.