This quote critically examines the moral implications of religious extremism and highlights a paradox that often goes unnoticed. Religions that advocate violence or punishments involving death, especially targeting those who differ in belief or practice, reflect a fundamental contradiction within their own doctrines. Such demands for violence betray a fundamental dehumanization and disregard for the value of human life, which is often touted as a core principle in many spiritual teachings. By demanding death for others, these religions relinquish their moral authority and betray their underlying spiritual messages of compassion, mercy, and understanding. The assertion that such a religion is 'worthy of nothing less than it expects for others' serves as a pointed critique: it suggests that these faiths, in their pursuit of exclusivity and righteousness through violence, are ultimately self-destructive and unjustifiable. The claim that this behavior is 'probably long overdue' also implies that society has historically overlooked or tolerated such extremism for too long, and that a much-needed cultural or moral reckoning is overdue. Reflecting on this, it becomes evident that true spiritual teachings—even in the face of differing beliefs—should promote dialogue over destruction, and compassion over condemnation. The quote urges us to question and challenge religious/legal systems that promote violence, as these beliefs undermine the very foundations of peaceful coexistence and moral integrity. It serves as a stark reminder that justice and morality should transcend religious fanaticism, fostering empathy and understanding instead of hatred and violence.