In this exchange, Nobodaddy introduces a philosophical perspective on the concept of the Big Bang. He explains that referring to it as the "Big Bang" implies a comparison to other types of bangs, which do not exist. This challenges Luka's understanding and points to the redundancy of the adjective "Big" when there is no other event to measure it against.

Nobodaddy's argument suggests a deeper inquiry into language and significance. By stating that the adjective loses meaning without comparison, it encourages readers to reflect on how we define and understand monumental events based on context and relativity, inviting a broader discussion on existence and the universe.