By 1981, the seventy-four-year-old Brezhnev, hobbled by a series of strokes and barely able to function, could be seen drooling on himself on his rare appearances on Soviet television. Rather than removing him, however, the Politburo merely nominated him for still more medals. Lenin-the "incandescent" Lenin, as Churchill called him-would have been appalled.
By 1981, Leonid Brezhnev was in poor health, suffering from multiple strokes that severely affected his ability to function. His infrequent public appearances on Soviet television revealed his deteriorating condition, as he was often seen drooling and unable to present himself adequately. Despite these issues, the Politburo chose not to replace him but instead continued to honor him with nominations for various medals, showcasing a disconnection from the reality of his decline.
This situation would have shocked historical figures like Lenin, who valued strong leadership and vigor in governance. Winston Churchill described Lenin as "incandescent," indicating the high standards of leadership expected during tumultuous times. In contrast, Brezhnev’s continued elevation through awards, despite his evident incapacity, reflected a stagnant political climate and a focus on maintaining appearances rather than addressing the need for effective leadership.
