Dogs are wonderful, and in many ways unique. But they are remarkably unremarkable in their intellectual and experiential capacities. Pigs are every bit as intelligent and feeling, by any sensible definition of the words. They can't hop into the back of a Volvo, but they can fetch, run and play, be mischievous, and reciprocate affection. So why don't they get to curl up by the fire? Why can't they at least be spared being tossed on the fire?
Dogs are often celebrated for their companionship and unique qualities, but according to Jonathan Safran Foer in "Eating Animals," they are not superior in intelligence or emotional depth compared to other animals like pigs. Pigs possess comparable intellectual and emotional capabilities, engaging in playful behaviors, forming bonds, and showing affection, similar to dogs. However, societal norms place dogs in a position of favor, leading to questions about the fairness of the treatment of different species.
Foer challenges the reader to consider why certain animals, such as pigs, are not afforded the same privileges as pets like dogs. Despite being equally intelligent and capable of forming emotional connections, pigs are often subjected to cruel treatment and exploitation. This disparity raises ethical concerns about how society values different animals and urges a reevaluation of our relationships with them.
