The speaker emphasizes the futility of relying solely on arguments without a strong and constant moral character. They reflect on their father's unwavering integrity and straightforward preaching of moral values, suggesting that true goodness does not stem from persuasive debates but from solid principles. Their father is portrayed as a virtuous individual, contrasting with the notion that complex arguments can produce genuine virtue.

Furthermore, the speaker uses a culinary analogy to argue that just as a good meal cannot be created through mere recipes, a truly good person cannot be formed from arguments alone. This rhetoric underlines the belief that authenticity and moral strength are rooted in character rather than intellectual persuasion, highlighting the importance of being grounded in one's values.