The quote underscores the tendency of gradual change—often championed as a pragmatic approach—to lead to an enduring status quo in real-world scenarios. Louis Menand’s discussion in 'The Metaphysical Club' illuminates how ideas about progress and reform are frequently implemented step-by-step, with a focus on avoiding upheaval. However, over time, these incremental changes can accumulate and entrench themselves, effectively maintaining existing structures or patterns rather than transforming them fundamentally. This phenomenon is akin to the philosophical concept of a slow erosion that ultimately culminates in permanence.

In practical terms, this suggests a paradox within social and political reform: even when change is introduced gradually to appease conservative elements or to minimize resistance, it can inadvertently result in a stable ‘new normal.’ Such persistence may be beneficial in providing stability and continuity but can also hinder more profound transformation that requires deliberate upheaval. Institutions, policies, or cultural norms are often resistant to swift change, reflecting deep-seated values and interconnected systems. As a result, incrementalist strategies, while seemingly cautious and progressive, might reaffirm the existing order more than challenge it. This insight prompts us to critically evaluate the efficacy of slow change—does it truly lead to progress, or does it ossify patterns that could be more efficiently reformed through decisive action?

Menand’s exploration reveals a nuanced truth about human endeavors to improve or innovate: the path of gradualism can cultivate a perennial cycle where every step is papered over with the desire for stability, leaving in place the foundational issues that need addressing. Recognizing this tendency is vital for anyone engaged in reform, policy-making, or social critique, as it invites a more mindful approach to whether incremental change is genuinely transformative or merely perpetuates existing conditions under the guise of progress.