The passage highlights the complexities of justifying Britain's involvement in a conflict while considering various historical and political influences. It underscores the need to present Belgium's situation as the primary reason for action, yet not ignore France's role as a significant factor. This delicate balance aims to engage British honor while prioritizing national interests, reflecting the intricate nature of foreign policy discussions that have developed over centuries.

Moreover, the author illustrates the challenge faced by a leader who must navigate this intricate discourse without the aid of previous great orators and leaders. The weight of historical tradition looms large over modern arguments, demanding a careful articulation of reasons that resonate with the public and politicians alike, despite the absence of the charismatic influence of past figures in British political history.