He was learning that to win a fight like this, it was not enough to know what one was fighting against. That was easy. He was fighting against the view that people could be killed for their ideas, and against the ability of any religion to place a limiting point on thought. But he needed, now, to be clear of what he was fighting for. Freedom of speech, freedom of the imagination, freedom from fear, and the beautiful, ancient art of which he was privileged to be a practitioner. Also skepticism, irreverence, doubt, satire, comedy, and unholy glee. He would never again flinch from the defense of these things. p. 285
In this passage, the author reflects on the nature of his struggle, emphasizing that merely understanding one's adversaries isn't sufficient. He is not only contending with the idea that people can be harmed for their beliefs but also confronting the limitations that any religion might place on free thought. To truly prevail in this battle, he realizes the importance of articulating what he stands for rather than just against.
He champions the ideals of freedom of speech, creative expression, and the absence of fear. Furthermore, he embraces skepticism, irreverence, and humor, recognizing these as essential elements of the artistic and intellectual journey. This realization fortifies his resolve to uphold and defend these values without hesitation, underscoring his commitment to the fundamental principles that enrich human experience.
