The choice -conseded west gives people who want to eat otherwise more space than any other culture has ever done, but the irony wants the completely not picky omnivore - 'I think everything is good, I eat everything' - may seem more socially more aware than the Man who tries to eat in a way that is good for society. The choice for a certain type of food is determined by all kinds of factors, but the reason {and even the consciousness} is usually not high on that list.
The concept of food choice in the Western diet provides individuals with a level of freedom that is unprecedented compared to other cultures. This vast array of options allows people to eat a wide variety of foods, yet there is a paradox in the attitude towards eating. The seemingly open-minded omnivore, who believes they can enjoy everything, may appear more socially conscious than someone who deliberately chooses a diet aimed at benefiting society.
Food decisions are influenced by many factors, such as convenience, culture, and personal taste, rather than a deeper understanding or awareness of their implications. Jonathan Safran Foer, in his book "Eating Animals," emphasizes that while individuals can select their diet, the thoughtfulness behind these choices often takes a back seat to other considerations. This disconnect between choice and consciousness raises questions about the true nature of our eating habits.
