How long had he been doing what was necessary instead of what was right? In a fair world they would be one and the same.

(0 Reviews)

In "The Fires of Heaven" by Robert Jordan, the protagonist struggles with the distinction between doing what is necessary versus what is morally right. This conflict raises questions about the choices individuals must make in difficult situations. The character reflects on the moral compromises often required in life and how actions are dictated by the harsh realities of the world, rather than ideal ethics. This contemplation emphasizes the complexity of human decisions. It suggests that in an ideal society, necessity and morality would align seamlessly, but in reality, they often clash. The quote invites readers to think about their own lives and the ethical dilemmas they face, highlighting the personal struggle between pragmatism and integrity.

In "The Fires of Heaven" by Robert Jordan, the protagonist struggles with the distinction between doing what is necessary versus what is morally right. This conflict raises questions about the choices individuals must make in difficult situations. The character reflects on the moral compromises often required in life and how actions are dictated by the harsh realities of the world, rather than ideal ethics.

This contemplation emphasizes the complexity of human decisions. It suggests that in an ideal society, necessity and morality would align seamlessly, but in reality, they often clash. The quote invites readers to think about their own lives and the ethical dilemmas they face, highlighting the personal struggle between pragmatism and integrity.

Page views
0
Update
February 17, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.