I don't care how they speculate, or what their answers are. We live as we can, we do what we must, and not everything goes by either Freudian or Victorian patterns. What I am sure of is that friendship-not love, friendship-is as possible between women as between men, and that in either case it is often stronger for not having to cross sexual picket lines. Sexuality and mistrust often go together, and both are incompatible with amicitia.
The quote expresses the idea that personal relationships cannot be easily categorized or confined to traditional frameworks like Freudian or Victorian models. The author emphasizes the importance of living authentically, doing what is necessary, and recognizing that friendship can flourish independently of sexual attraction or romantic tension. He asserts that women's friendships can be as profound as those between men, and in some cases, these platonic connections may actually be stronger because they avoid the complexities introduced by sexuality.
The notion that sexuality can complicate relationships by introducing mistrust highlights the purity of friendship, termed "amicitia," which thrives in supportive environments. By rejecting societal expectations around love and sexuality, the author champions the value of deep, non-romantic bonds between individuals, particularly women. This perspective encourages a broader understanding of relationships, valuing the essence of companionship where emotional support and loyalty supersede romantic involvement.
