...I finally went back to my seat in the second row and sat there doing what I've done throughout my professional life: I tried to think, first, how to make credible a somewhat extreme, if not outright ridiculous story, and, next, how, after telling it, to fortify and defend myself from the affronted who read into the story an intention having perhaps to do less with the author's perversity than with their own.
In "Operation Shylock: A Confession," Philip Roth reflects on the challenges of conveying a complex and potentially absurd narrative. He describes the process of returning to a familiar position, where he must grapple with the tension of presenting a story that may be perceived as extreme or nonsensical. Roth highlights the difficulty in making such tales credible, suggesting an inherent conflict between artistic expression and audience interpretation.
The author also contemplates the potential reactions to his work, acknowledging that readers might project their own anxieties or interpretations onto his narrative. This insight reveals Roth's awareness of the subjective nature of storytelling, where the intentions of the author can be misconstrued. Ultimately, he underscores the precarious balance between creative expression and public perception, emphasizing his desire to defend his narrative choices against misguided criticisms.