I should mention that all of the above explorers were unqualified failures. Not coincidentally, they were also all British. Americans admire success. Englishman admire heroic failure. Given a choice -- at least in my reading -- I'm un-American enough to take quixotry over efficiency any day.
In "Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader," author Anne Fadiman discusses the concept of failure among explorers, specifically highlighting that all the mentioned explorers were British and deemed unqualified failures. This observation brings attention to cultural differences in how achievements are perceived, particularly contrasting American and British values. Americans tend to celebrate success, striving for tangible results, while the British have a tradition of valuing the notion of heroic failure.
Fadiman expresses a preference for the romantic notion of quixotry over mere efficiency, suggesting that the ideals behind striving toward high goals, even if ultimately unsuccessful, hold a greater appeal for her. She implies that the pursuit of lofty dreams, despite the lack of practical outcomes, reflects a nobler and more admirable human experience, which resonates with her personal values and reading perspective.
