In the discussion surrounding the concept of consensus in science, Michael Crichton expresses strong skepticism towards what is termed "consensus science." He believes that this trend is dangerous and should be halted immediately. Crichton highlights that the assertion of a scientific consensus often serves as a tactic to bypass critical debate. By claiming that an issue is already resolved based on the majority's opinion, it discourages further inquiry and questioning.

Crichton warns that when people invoke the idea of consensus among scientists, it can be a signal of manipulative or deceptive practices. He implies that such claims should be approached with caution, as they may mask ulterior motives, especially in contexts where financial interests are involved. His perspective advocates for a more open and rigorous examination of scientific issues rather than accepting conclusions based on majority opinion alone.