This quote presents a sharp, somewhat irreverent take on the nature of human dissatisfaction and ambition. It posits that dissatisfaction is a driving force behind human progress and evolution. By stating that if humans were capable of being satisfied, they would remain primitive—living in trees and eating bugs— the quote underscores how much discontent has propelled humanity from basic survival to complex societies and advanced technologies. This view gives a somewhat cynical but practical lens on our continuous striving for improvement, greatness, or change. Satisfaction, often cast as a virtue, is here framed as a potential stagnant state that is incompatible with growth.

Reflecting on this, it becomes clear that discontent, while uncomfortable, serves as a motivator that pushes individuals and society toward better circumstances. It raises philosophical questions about contentment versus ambition: to what extent should one seek satisfaction with the present versus pushing for something more? This duality is essential in understanding the human condition. The quote challenges the reader to reconsider the value of their dissatisfaction—not as a failing, but as a catalyst for creativity, innovation, and survival. It also critiques complacency, warning that too much contentment can lead to stagnation and prevent societal advancement.

Ultimately, this quote taps into a broader conversation about human nature and the paradox of ever-present unrest driving both our pain and our achievements. It reminds us that dissatisfaction might be an inherent and perhaps necessary component of our humanity, fueling evolution not just bodily, but intellectually and culturally.