If it was not intended as a veto, then it must have been intended for commanders to interpret as they saw fit, which brings the matter to that melting point of warfare-the temperament of the individual commander.When the moment of live ammunition approaches, the moment to which all his professional training has been directed, when the lives of men under him, the issue of the combat, even the fate of a campaign may depend upon his decision at a given moment, what happens inside the heart and vitals of a commander? Some are made bold by the moment, some irresolute, some carefully judicious, some paralyzed and powerless to act.
The quote highlights the crucial role of individual commanders in warfare, particularly when faced with life-and-death decisions. It suggests that if a directive is ambiguous, it relies heavily on the commander’s judgment and interpretation. This responsibility becomes especially intense when the stakes are highest, as commanders must decide under pressure that could affect many lives and the outcome of battles.
This perspective brings forth the idea that each commander’s temperament can greatly influence their actions. Some may rise to the occasion, demonstrating bravery and decisiveness, while others may feel overwhelmed and struggle to make decisions. This variation in response underscores the human element in military leadership, where personal traits can determine the course of events in critical moments.
