In "The Map of Time" by Felix J. Palma, an opinion is offered about Henry James, noting that if Wells found him praiseworthy, it was primarily due to his remarkable ability to craft lengthy sentences without conveying substantial meaning. This critique highlights how James's intricate style can sometimes overshadow the clarity of his ideas. The commentary suggests that Wells may admire the craftsmanship of James's prose, yet he perceives it as ultimately vacuous. The focus on the form rather than the content raises questions about the effectiveness of such writing in literature, indicating a divide between style and substance that can frustrate readers seeking more direct communication.

If Wells recognized any merit in Henry James, it was his undeniable talent for using very long sentences in order to say nothing at all.

This critique highlights how James's intricate style can sometimes overshadow the clarity of his ideas.