In my experience, the most staunchly held views are based on ignorance or accepted dogma, not carefully considered accumulations of facts. The more you expose the intricacies and realtities of the situation, the less clear-cut things become.
In her book "Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife," author Mary Roach highlights how strong beliefs are often rooted in ignorance or blindly accepted ideas rather than informed reasoning. She suggests that when faced with the complexities of a subject, the clarity of simple viewpoints tends to diminish. As people engage with deeper aspects of a topic, they may find that their initial, definitive opinions become less tenable.
Roach's perspective encourages readers to confront the nuances surrounding beliefs, particularly regarding the afterlife and related concepts. By challenging dogmatic views and encouraging exploration of evidence and intricacies, she advocates for a more thoughtful approach to understanding controversial topics. This suggests that a thorough investigation often yields a more complex and less absolute understanding of life's mysteries.