This quote highlights the often overlooked human aspect behind the consumption of literature. While literature is celebrated for its artistic and cultural value, individual preferences can vary greatly. Susan's disdain for Literature despite its celebrated status underscores a universal truth: not everyone connects with the same form of storytelling or literary style. Sometimes, the prescribed or canonical forms of 'Literature' can feel distant or impersonal to readers, especially when they prioritize engaging storytelling, relatable characters, or straightforward narratives.

The phrase 'In theory it was, around now, Literature' suggests a societal or traditional expectation that this time would be dedicated to literary pursuits. Yet, Susan's preference for just reading 'a good book' emphasizes that personal enjoyment and authenticity often trump societal or academic constructs of what should be enjoyed. This personal choice weaves into a larger dialogue about the value of individual tastes against the backdrop of cultural norms.

Moreover, the quote subtly questions the overemphasis on literary status—what is deemed 'literature' versus enjoyable reading? It nudges us to consider that reading should be a source of pleasure, escape, or enlightenment suited to the reader's preferences rather than conforming to a standard. Sometimes, undervaluing popular or less 'literary' books deprives readers of joy and personal connection to literature.

Ultimately, this quote celebrates independent reading preferences and emphasizes that literary appreciation is deeply personal, about what resonates with the individual. It encourages us to cherish the books that truly matter to us, regardless of their status within traditional literary hierarchies.