This quote underscores the profound impact of foreign interference on Iran's quest for sovereignty and democratic development. Historically, Iran's struggle for democracy has often been interrupted or undermined by external powers seeking their strategic and economic interests. The incursions by Britain and Russia between 1905 and 1911 exemplify early 20th-century imperial pursuits, which prioritized control over Iran's vast resources and geopolitical position. Their meddling effectively disrupted Iran's nascent democratic movement, illustrating how external forces can stifle internal political progress for selfish gains. Similarly, the 1953 CIA-backed coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh epitomizes clandestine foreign intervention designed to secure Western interests, notably oil privileges, at the expense of Iran’s democratic aspirations. Such interventions have cultivated deep-seated skepticism toward foreign influence among Iranians and have contributed to persistent mistrust within the nation's political landscape. This pattern reveals a recurring theme: external powers often justify their interventions under the guise of restoring stability or preventing chaos, but in reality, they prioritize their strategic advantages. The consequences are profound—delayed political progress, increased resentment towards foreign influence, and a narrative that foreign powers deliberately impede Iran’s path towards self-determination. Recognizing these historical patterns is essential for understanding Iran’s contemporary struggles with sovereignty and democracy. It also prompts reflection on how the international community can respect the self-determination of nations without undermining their sovereignty, emphasizing the importance of genuine support for democratic movements rather than covert operations or manipulations.