Ironically, the utterly unselective omnivore -- "I'm easy; I'll eat anything" -- can appear more socially sensitive than the individual who tries to eat in a way that is good for society.
In "Eating Animals," Jonathan Safran Foer highlights an interesting paradox regarding the nature of food choices. He suggests that those who consume a wide variety of foods without discrimination can sometimes seem more attuned to social dynamics compared to individuals who intentionally select their diets based on ethical considerations. This observation prompts readers to reflect on the complexities of dietary habits and their implications for social awareness.
Foer's argument challenges the assumption that mindful eating inherently signals greater social responsibility. Instead, he points out that an unselective eater, by virtue of their openness to all foods, might inadvertently demonstrate a form of social adaptability that more selective eaters lack. This perspective invites a deeper conversation about the motivations behind our food choices and their broader societal impacts.