This quote highlights the biological variability within the human population and how certain individuals are more sensitive to electromagnetic radiation than others. The assertion that a subset of people cannot tolerate radiation emitted by utility meters suggests that exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), even from commonplace sources, can have adverse health effects for some individuals. This recognition is critical because it underscores the importance of considering human diversity when evaluating technological impacts. In many discussions about electromagnetic pollution, the general population is often assumed to be equally affected, but this quote emphasizes that vulnerability exists and should not be overlooked. The concern raised is not just theoretical; it impacts real-world policies and safety standards. For those who are sensitive or allergic to EMFs, exposure to typically benign sources like utility meters becomes a health hazard, potentially leading to symptoms or sickness. This also raises questions about the adequacy of current safety standards that often focus on average effects rather than sensitive subgroups. The notion of individual sensitivity supports evolving views on environmental health and encourages further research into personalized risk assessments. It also provokes ethical debates around the deployment of such technologies—should alternatives be provided for sensitive individuals? Ultimately, recognizing and respecting biological diversity in response to technological exposures can foster safer, more inclusive public health policies. As technology progresses, it becomes increasingly vital to consider these variances to ensure that advancements do not inadvertently exclude or harm vulnerable populations, aligning with principles of medical and environmental justice.