The passage reflects on the challenges of applying philosophical concepts in everyday life. It suggests that not only the general public but even philosophers themselves struggle to truly implement philosophy in a practical manner. This raises questions about the accessibility and utility of philosophical ideas, indicating that the complexities of moral reasoning can be used by anyone, often manipulatively, much like the discussion of truth in persuasion.

Additionally, the text emphasizes the deeply personal nature of moral philosophy. It suggests that these concepts are inherently subjective and may resist clear communication between individuals, making shared understanding difficult. The reference to Wittgenstein underscores the idea that even if a different perspective could articulate its thoughts, the fundamental differences might still create barriers to comprehension, illustrating the unique challenges of conveying moral truths.