Look, I don't see why bad artists - I mean artists who are obviously incompetent... - why they should be presented hypocritically as good artists just because they're supposed to be advancing the frontiers of freedom of expression or... ...demonstrating that there should be no limit on subject matter.
In Anthony Burgess's book "Earthly Powers," the author critiques the notion that all artists should be shielded from criticism simply for their attempts to push boundaries in expression. He questions the validity of labeling incompetent artists as good, merely to honor the ideals of freedom of expression. This perspective challenges the idea that all artistic endeavors are equally valuable or worthy of recognition.
Burgess emphasizes that artistic merit should not be overlooked in favor of a broader narrative about freedom. He suggests that just because an artist is exploring controversial subjects, it doesn't automatically render their work valuable or competent. The distinction between genuine artistry and superficial attempts at provocation is crucial in evaluating the true impact of an artist's contributions.