More fundamentally, I'm interested in memory because it's a filter through which we see our lives, and because it's foggy and obscure, the opportunities for self-deception are there. In the end, as a writer, I'm more interested in what people tell themselves happened rather than what actually happened.
Memory functions as an intricate lens through which individuals interpret their past experiences, shaping their personal narratives. Its foggy and obscure nature means that our recollections are rarely precise or fully accurate; instead, they are often colored by emotions, biases, and the passage of time. This inherent imperfection opens the door to self-deception, allowing us to craft stories that may serve comfort or justify present beliefs, even if they distort reality. As a writer, this fascination with the malleability of memory resonates deeply. It highlights how human identity is constructed not solely on factual events but on the stories we tell ourselves about those events. The distinction between what truly happened and what we believe happened becomes blurred, emphasizing the importance of perception over objective truth. This perspective is essential for understanding human nature, as it suggests that our version of reality is often subjective, rooted in the deeper need to find coherence and meaning in our lives. It also raises questions about authenticity, accountability, and how we grow through reconstructing our memories. Exploring these themes encourages empathy, as we recognize that everyone’s understanding of their past may be more about self-preservation than factual accuracy. Ultimately, this insight invites us to reflect on the stories we hold about ourselves and others, understanding that these stories are as significant, if not more so, than the concrete facts they are based on.
