In a tense moment, a woman approaches Mr. Walsh, seeking his opinion regarding a trial. She informs him that her client is accused of murdering his business partner and then disposing of the body with quicklime. Mr. Walsh seems skeptical, prompting the woman to defend her client by highlighting the absurdity of using quicklime as a method for disposal, asserting that modern practices favor chemical hydrolysis instead, which is more effective.

The exchange reveals underlying themes of crime and the intricacies of legal defense, showcasing not just the grim nature of the charges, but also the technical knowledge required in such cases. The woman's attempt to draw Mr. Walsh's insights illuminates the intersection of morality, legality, and forensic science in the pursuit of truth.