The speaker reflects on the concept of brilliance, recognizing that not every idea deemed “brilliant” is necessarily good or advisable. They list examples such as nuclear weapons and diet drinks, emphasizing that just because something can be named an innovative idea doesn't imply it should be pursued or accepted widely. This critical perspective serves as a caution against blindly following suggestions.

The conversation highlights the importance of discernment when evaluating ideas. Just because something sounds appealing or clever doesn't mean it should be acted upon. The speaker suggests that individuals should think critically rather than rely on others' opinions, encouraging a more thoughtful consideration of ideas before embracing them.