In "Paris to the Moon," Adam Gopnik suggests that a lack of fondness or enthusiasm is a fundamental aspect of art criticism. The statement underscores the idea that an objective analysis often stems from a critical distance, where the critic’s ambivalence can lead to deeper insights about the artwork. This perspective invites a more analytical and thoughtful examination of art, rather than just a surface appreciation.

Gopnik implies that genuine engagement with art may require some level of discomfort or disconnection. This critical stance allows critics to evaluate and dissect artistic works, leading to richer discussions and interpretations that transcend simple appreciation. The acknowledgment of ambivalence can thus serve as a catalyst for meaningful dialogue about art and culture.