This quote delves into the profound tension between loyalty and self-preservation. It suggests that genuine escape or liberation from difficult circumstances often requires betrayal, particularly of those who hold trust in us. In a broader sense, it evokes the moral dilemmas faced when the bonds of allegiance conflict with personal survival or freedom. The statement can be interpreted as a commentary on the complex nature of trust and the sometimes uncomfortable choices that come with loyalty. It raises questions about whether true escape can ever truly be achieved without compromising one's integrity or betraying others who rely on us.

The quote challenges the reader to think about the cost of loyalty and the moments when allegiance becomes a hindrance to personal salvation. It touches upon themes of conspiracy, morality, and the sacrifices we make—sometimes unspoken—when trying to free ourselves from oppressive situations. Such hard choices are emblematic of wars, political struggles, or personal betrayals.

In the context of 'Round the Bend' by Nevil Shute, these notions might be reflected in characters who are caught between moral duty and self-interest. The quote underscores the idea that, in certain situations, the only way out might involve betraying what is sacred to the individual or the group. This creates a complex moral landscape where loyalty and morality are often at odds, forcing us to question whether any escape is truly worth the cost.

Ultimately, the quote serves as a stark reminder that in some circumstances, avoiding betrayal or treachery may be nearly impossible if one is to escape certain bindings, whether these are emotional, social, or political.