pro-choice' is a misnomer. There is not really an issue of choice at all. It is against the law to cut short someone's life, period. To say that a fetus is not a life is to split hairs, since all major bodily systems are in place at the time most abortions are undertaken. To say that it is a woman's right to choose is also unclear, because it is not only her body but another's as well. In a society that stands behind the best interests of a child, it seems strange indeed
The phrase "pro-choice" is misleading because the core issue revolves around the value of life. The law prohibits ending a life, which raises questions about the status of a fetus. Many argue that significant bodily systems are already developed by the time most abortions occur, challenging the notion that a fetus is not a life worth considering.
Additionally, the argument for a woman's right to choose is complicated. It suggests that the decision is solely hers, disregarding the existence of another being. In a society that prioritizes the welfare of children, the rationale for abortion becomes contradictory, prompting a reevaluation of what it means to advocate for both women and the unborn.
