revert back is commonly seen and always redundant: 'If no other claimant can be found, the right to the money will revert back to her' {Daily Telegraph}. Delete back.

๐Ÿ“– Bill Bryson

๐ŸŒ American  |  ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ผ Writer

๐ŸŽ‚ December 8, 1951
(0 Reviews)

The phrase "revert back" is often criticized for being redundant, as the word "revert" already implies returning to a previous state. Many language experts suggest that using both words is unnecessary and can clutter communication. For example, in the quote mentioning the claimant's right to money, the use of "revert back" should simply be "revert." This change enhances clarity and maintains the original meaning without the extra word.

Bill Bryson's book "Troublesome Words" addresses such common language issues, highlighting how some phrases can be misleading or overly complex. By eliminating redundancy, writers and speakers can convey their messages more effectively, making their communication clearer and more direct. Focusing on precise language helps maintain the integrity of expression in both writing and everyday speech.

Page views
9
Update
February 18, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.